METAPHYSICS OF QUALITY
THE METAPHYSICS OF QUALITY
While reading
Wikipedia’s entry about Robert Pirsig’s philosophy of Metaphysics of Quality, I
noted with great interest that Pirsig attended a peyote ceremony which led him
into what he called “a mushroom cloud of thought.” The article explains that “The nature of
mystical experience plays an underlying role throughout his work.” Recent scientific studies are providing
supporting evidence that hallucinogens promote experiences with lasting
spiritual/mystical significance. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=neuroscientists-probe-psy
Can I
just say, I want to go, too!!! After attending
such a ceremony, I might be more productively able to connect the dots of Pirsig’s metaphysical
maze. However, since I don’t see a
class field trip as such in the future, I will have to settle for my Earth
bound thoughts on Quality. Maybe I will listen to Pink Floyd and see if
half of the equation is more effective than nothing.
When determining the “quality” of something or someone, it
seems that a comparison is implied. The
quality is determined as compared to the “gold standard.” But, what/who sets the “gold standard?” And whose perspective sets the standard by
which all other levels of quality are determined? The person with the most “Quality?” Unless you happen to be the most qualified to
determine quality, does your perspective matter? And can one appoint oneself as King/Queen of
Quality?
Yeah,
it seems I am caught in one of those pesky circles that Brady so eloquently
elaborated on in his blog. Ah, if only I
had some peyote, I might be able to jump off the circle and see the origin of
the dots and know how to connect them.
Pirsig
defines quality as a perceptual experience first. Each
of us has our own experiences and perceptions and whether these are valid to
use as standards to judge “quality” I have no idea. Regardless of whether we are discussing the
quality of ideas, the quality of an education, the quality of a literary author,
an item of Quality withstands the test of time.
But, for the immediate present
situation how to determine quality remains an enigma. As Persig explains, “Quality exists always as
a perceptual experience before it is ever thought of descriptively or
academically.”
Pirsig’s
divided static quality into inorganic, biological, social, and intellectual
patterns in ascending order of morality.
He placed institutions into the Social Pattern --- would that include
universities? Or would schools be
elevated morally into Intellectual Patterns?
Or do they serve both patterns? I would think the learning institutions
of Newton’s era would be a gold standard for an institution achieving the
Intellectual Pattern status.
Certainly, I have the privilege of knowing
professors who elevate their students into the top rung of Intellectual
Patterns as described by Pirsig. Teachers,
such as these, encourage their students to expand their horizons; to ask life
changing questions; to not fear the answers they receive; to seek the
connectedness of all things on micro and macro levels. Mentors that care enough to reach out to
their students understand that their presence has the potential to completely
alter the pathways of their students' lives --- and yet, these life coaches don’t buckle
under the pressure. They continue to
light the pathway for those on the journey of finding Quality. The beautiful spirits of these teachers stretch
the very existence of the souls they meet.
Truly, the impact of their presence on the planet will continue to
ripple outward for all eternity.
And
then there are the “others.” Just
because a person is a “teacher” definitely does not mean they have the skill
set to “teach.” Arrogantly standing in
front of a classroom does not imbue one with the ability to lead or explain --- it just means they have the ability to hold dry erase
markers and run power point presentations.
This is NOT quality. COMPARED to “true professors,” these poor substitutes
are glaringly and obviously sub-standard.
Last
semester, I had a science teacher that raised my standards of what I considered
a “quality” instructor. He understood
where students usually struggled and instead of using it as an opportunity to “trick
or trip up” the students, he was extremely conscientious and made the extra
effort to be clear about the troubling sections. When this professor invited students to his
office if they had questions, he was sincere.
He did not see this as an opportunity to flaunt his arrogant brilliance
and look down his nose at those who did not instinctively “get” chemistry. He was there to support his students. After having the awesome privilege of sitting
in his classroom, what I expect from a professor and what I consider a “Quality”
education was elevated to a higher standard.
MSU's Honor’s Seminars are the “gold standard” of academia.
Students of the Honors College have the tremendous opportunity to read mind provoking
texts and explore meaningful questions. Being
able to immerse oneself in a classroom with people who desire an educational
experience above the mundane with a professor who appreciates and is not
threatened by “thinking” students follows the spirit of the ancient learning
centers that the world’s greatest thinkers attended.
How to
instill quality in a learning institution is a dilemma. My brother is a high school teacher and the
standardized testing permeates so much
of the school year that he rarely has time to actually teach history. He teaches how to take a test more than he
teaches the students about the history they are so apt to repeat in their ignorance.
At
MSU, the students are able to fill out a survey at the end of the semester
grading the teacher. I appreciate the
opportunity to express my thoughts: Did
I get my money’s worth out of the class/instructor? Was the reward for time spent a valuable
investment or a waste of time?
Striving for quality in our educational system is certainly an admirable and worthwhile goal. How to insure that occurs is a challenge.
Striving for quality in our educational system is certainly an admirable and worthwhile goal. How to insure that occurs is a challenge.